9️⃣1️⃣2️⃣ Richmond, VA: how many RPD cops does it take to shove a bicyclist to the ground and arrest them? 🤔 I count 8
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) September 2, 2020
Today. The cops are still rioting...
1 September 2020 PM
[@broadcastben_]
pic.twitter.com/yGuRnPVRv1
3rd angle of 8️⃣8️⃣2️⃣ in Richmond VA, of cops beating people outside GWAR Bar
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) August 23, 2020
20 August 2020 PM
[@swampdaddyx]
pic.twitter.com/qcdvoTcki3
More of 8️⃣8️⃣2️⃣ in Richmond VA, of Richmond police starting the violence outside of GWAR Bar
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) August 23, 2020
20 August 2020 PM
[IG: https://t.co/3tkKsrQoLg] pic.twitter.com/NNbRwrNRQO
Thread with more of 8️⃣8️⃣2️⃣ in Richmond VA
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) August 21, 2020
20 August 2020 PM https://t.co/WgnTW45h7M
8️⃣8️⃣2️⃣ Richmond, VA: a protestor assembled on private property with explicit permission of the property owner is arrested for filming cops, then another is shoved to the ground for sport
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) August 21, 2020
The cops are still rioting
20 August 2020 PM
[@JLJLovesRVA]
pic.twitter.com/FvRgwskcIs
8️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ Portsmouth, VA: cops file facially deficient charges against a state senator and other officials, then *falsely name the DA as a witness* to stop her from having prosecutorial control over the cases
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) August 19, 2020
Charges: https://t.co/TN9v4dNMta
Naming the DA: https://t.co/B4aYKOAxFh
8️⃣3️⃣2️⃣ Richmond, VA: as with 8️⃣3️⃣0️⃣, RPD is deliberately targeting journalists for arrest
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) July 27, 2020
26 July 2020 PM
[@GoadGatsby]
pic.twitter.com/EKIufKBk3z
Here's the applicable quote from Glik, mentioned in the previous tweethttps://t.co/2Jpgb6cj6m
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) July 27, 2020
More of 8️⃣3️⃣0️⃣ / 8️⃣3️⃣2️⃣ in Richmond VA: the police chief claims police alone have authority to decide who are "members of the press"
— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) July 27, 2020
[Contrast that with, e.g., Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F3d 78, 84 (1st Cir 2011)]https://t.co/JWf7aFwvD2